Hunting down stores that haven't reported
Jumping between group chats, email, and shared folders to find which store's closing report is missing — then following up.
CTRL-M · AX CONSULTING
Your stores’ numbers — HQ shouldn’t have to rebuild them.
Waiting on each store's closing report, pasting POS and delivery-app figures into spreadsheets, chasing down numbers that don't add up? Ctrl-M diagnoses your HQ's repetitive work and connects it to RestoGenie. We validate one task on real data first, then scale only what's proven to the brand and every store.
Currently serving operations in South Korea. International rollout and PoC inquiries are welcome.
Every morning, HQ rebuilds yesterday's numbers by hand.
Every store reports at a different time in a different format, and when a number is missing, someone has to chase it down. The HQ report is only finished once all the data is in. It's familiar — but it doesn't have to be done by hand.
Merging every store's spreadsheet into one
Copying sales, delivery, ad, and staffing data in mismatched formats, then re-aligning column names and number formats.
Asking the store again when numbers disagree
When POS sales and settlement figures don't match, you call the store — and the report stalls until they reply.
Before stores even report, HQ already sees the status.
This isn't a project to replace your POS or delivery apps. RestoGenie gathers each store's data on the same basis, and HQ only reviews the stores with gaps or anomalies. You spend less time producing reports and more time deciding which store to support first.
Every store's performance, on one basis
POS and delivery-channel sales, organized by brand, store, and channel — compared on a single screen.
See only the stores that need attention
Surfaces the stores worth checking first — missing reports, sharp sales swings, settlement gaps.
The stores a supervisor should visit, first
Sales declines, recurring reviews, and operational anomalies together — so you decide which store to support first.
Repetitive questions answered from the manual
HQ notices and operating manuals are connected, so store questions get the same consistent answer.
Before a company-wide project, we change one HQ report first.
We follow the HQ workflow
Which team receives which file, who edits the numbers, and where it gets reported next.
We pick one report
Starting with a report that takes the most time and is shared across teams, we set the data basis and automation scope.
We watch it for 30 days
Run it on real data from 1–3 pilot stores and measure how much collection time and how many gaps were cut.
We make it the brand standard
Once it's proven, we define permissions, closing rules, owners, and exception handling — then roll it out to every store.
* Consulting scope and PoC timelines may vary depending on brand size, connected systems, and data readiness.
Start with whatever takes HQ the longest.
Diagnose HQ's repetitive work
We walk through the spreadsheets and reporting flows that ops, finance, marketing, and supervisors each manage separately.
Team interviews · file flows · priorities →Automate one unified report
We change one task many people repeat first — like per-store sales roll-ups or settlement reconciliation.
1–3 stores · 30-day HQ validation →Roll out the brand operating standard
With HQ owners, we set closing times, data basis, permissions, and exception handling — then scale to every store.
Operating rules · owner training · results →Operating in another market?
The challenges of disconnected data and multi-store operations cross borders. Tell us about your locations, systems and the workflow you want to improve.
Discuss an international rollout or PoC.
We currently serve operations in South Korea. International availability, local integrations and pilot terms are reviewed separately.
BEFORE YOU DECIDE
Multi-brand, global HQ and PE teams: validate Korea operations first.
Define what can be compared using available data before committing to new metrics. Korea rollouts and international interest or PoCs are scoped separately.
| Decision | Preparation | PoC check |
|---|---|---|
| Brand and store comparisons | Target organizations/stores, common KPI definitions and POS source data | Reconcile source totals using the same business-day and cancellation definitions |
| Cost and profit/loss | Availability of purchasing, payroll and other costs alongside sales | Do not infer profit from missing cost data; scope ERP/accounting integrations separately |
| Permissions and export | Viewing permissions for HQ, brands and stores; reporting format | Verify role-based access and export conditions with the agreed data |
| Korea operations PoC | Pilot stores, period, source-system contacts and target workflow | Review reconciliation, missing-data handling and workflow completion before discussing expansion |
Questions before you start
Where does an AX engagement start?
With the repeated work and its source files: who receives them, who changes them and where the result is used. We select a concrete task before defining implementation.
Is the pilot always 30 days?
The framework describes a 30-day, 1–3-store pilot as a starting model. Actual scope and timelines are agreed based on data readiness and operating conditions.
How does consulting relate to the subscription?
RestoGenie provides the product foundation. Diagnosis, company-specific integration or workflow development and adoption support are separately scoped consulting or development work.
Get Started · AX consultation
Just tell us one thing HQ does over and over.
Per-store sales roll-ups, checking for missing reports, settlement reconciliation, merging supervisor reports — tell us what you repeat daily or weekly, and we'll look at where to start cutting it.
01
Consultation
Workflows and store count
02
Tailored demo
Data and feature scope
03
Plan a pilot
Timing, fees and rollout criteria